Industry Benchmarks: Finally Know If Your Numbers Are Actually Good

See exactly how any page compares to similar pages, built entirely from encrypted, opt-in, aggregate data, so no individual page's numbers are ever exposed.

The problem

A number by itself doesn't mean anything: a page at 2.1 percent engagement could be crushing it or barely getting by, and engagement swings so much by niche, size, and content type that a generic "average engagement rate" from a random blog post is close to useless. This gets worse the moment someone else relies on your read: a marketer telling a boss "engagement is up" needs to answer "compared to what, and is that good," and nobody has ever handed you a clean, current answer specific to your kind of page.

What we're building

A benchmarking layer that compares any page you've captured against a peer set of similar pages, matched by size and category, and gives you a plain answer: pages like this average 1.2 percent engagement, you're at 2.1 percent, top 18 percent. It's built entirely from PostSnag's own users, and only from users who explicitly opt in: every contribution is encrypted, and the only thing that ever comes out the other side is an aggregate pattern, never any individual page's data:

  • Peer groups matched by size tier and category, so a small page never sits against a huge one, shown as a percentile, not just an average.

  • Built only from data users choose to contribute, encrypted end to end, surfaced only as aggregate patterns, never individual numbers.

  • Gets more precise as more people opt in, with tighter, more specific peer groups over time.


How it works for you

Open any profile and the benchmark sits right alongside its own stats, no extra step required: you see the page's engagement rate next to a plain-language read of where it lands against similar pages. Opting your own captured data into the shared pool is a one-time toggle, and your numbers are never shown to anyone individually, ever, in exchange.

What you get

  • An honest answer to "is this actually good," specific to a page's real size and niche.

  • A percentile you can say out loud in a meeting, backed by real peer data.

  • Total privacy on your own data: encrypted, aggregate only, opt-in, never exposed individually.

For example

A day care franchise owner sees their page at 1.4 percent engagement and assumes the worst; Industry Benchmarks shows similar community pages average 1.1 percent, putting them in the top 24 percent. An agency swaps "engagement was up this month" for "you moved from the top 30 percent of your peer group to the top 15 percent this quarter," a line that actually means something to a client.

What it unlocks

Industry Benchmarks is the outward-facing half of a complete performance picture: the overperformance score tells you how a post did against a page's own history, this tells you how the page stacks up against everyone like it, and together they're the context that makes a white-label report or client deck land harder.

Who it's for

Marketers and agencies who report numbers to a client or a boss, page owners who want a real gut check instead of a guess, and anyone sizing up a niche who needs more than one page's raw stats.

Share update with 0 linked conversations as well

Upvoters
Status

In Review

Board
💡

Feature Request

Date

About 17 hours ago

Author

PostSnag

Subscribe to post

Get notified by email when there are changes.